October 31, 2019
https://doi.org/10.23999/j.dtomp.2019.10.3
J Diagn Treat Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2019;3:256−7.
Under a Creative Commons license
Nagorniak IV, Nagorniak KY. Intraoperative look on immediate implant placement in anterior maxilla with exhibiting periapical lesions. J Diagn Treat Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2019;3(10):256−7.
Sir:
Infection in the site of immediate dental implantation became an invetigation purpose of numerous studies.1-3 Conclusions of the prominent reports:
An illustrated review of Navaes et al presented a perfect guide for surgery in the infected sites into maxillary bone tissue.5 Supported the highlited successful surgical steps5 we present a successful implantation (at 7-month follow-up) having: 1) profuse purulent discharge on the day of surgery, 2) lack of sufficient alveolar bone, and 3) with no usage of augmentation materials.
A 59-year-old Caucasian male presented with an unsuccessfully treated periapical lesions of the mobile teeth 1.1 and 2.1 (Fig 1A) and permanent halitosis due to purulent discharge. Two dental implants were placed obtaining primary stability immediatly after removal of teeth 1.1 and 2.1 with periapical lesions (Fig 1B), meticulous curettage, and rinsing by chlorhexidine 0.12%. Surgical step accompanied with a bleeding from a lateral incisive canal (synonyms: neurovascular variation in anterior palate, accessory canal of the anterior maxilla, and lateral incisor canal)6 located at the palatal aspect of the left central incisor`s socket. Figure 2B demonstrates intraoperative stage of temporary crowns` producing. Oral clindamycin was prescribed 1 hour before surgery and continues 600 mg twice daily for 5 days. About 0.12 percent of chlorhexidine rinse twice a day until suture removal was also recommended.7 At 7-month follow-up cone-beam computed tomography showed a good bone union near osseintegrated implants.
Performing an immediate implantation into the tooth socket sites with periapical lesions, infection, and alveolar bone dehiscence is possible with a receiving a predictable functional and esthtic outcome in anterior maxilla. Two key factors of success in those cases are 1) thorough debridement of the site prior to placement and 2) primary stability.
Lindeboom JA, Tjiook Y, Kroon FH. Immediate placement of implants in periapical infected sites: a prospective randomized study in 50 patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006;101:705-10. Crossref
Waasdorp JA, Evian CI, Mandracchia M. Immediate placement of implants into infected sites: a systematic review of the literature. J Periodontol 2010;81:801–8. Crossref
Casap N, Zeltser C, Wexler A, Tarazi E, Zeltser R. Immediate placement of dental implants into debrided infected dentoalveolar sockets. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65:384–92. Crossref
Chrcanovic BR, Martins MD, Wennerberg A. Immediate placement of implants into infected sites: a systematic review. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015;17 Suppl 1:e1-e16. Crossref
Novaes Jr. AB, Muglia VA, Ramos, UD, Reino DM, Ayub LG. Immediate implants in extraction sockets with periapical lesions: an illustrated review. J Osseointegr 2013;5:45–52. Crossref
Nagorniak IV. Clinical appearance of lateral incisive canal. J Diagn Treat Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2019;3:200. Crossref
Surapaneni H, Yalamanchili PS, Basha MH, Potluri S, Elisetti N, Kiran Kumar MV. Antibiotics in dental implants: a review of literature. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2016;8(Suppl 1):S28-S31. Crossref