November 30, 2020
https://doi.org/10.23999/j.dtomp.2020.11.2
J Diagn Treat Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2020;4:197–216.
Under a Creative Commons license
Cherniak OS, Zaritska VI, Snisarevskyi PP, Fesenko II, Blinova VP, Koba NM, Pavlenko RA, Holodenko VM. Single and multiple odontogenic cutaneous sinus tracts. J Diagn Treat Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2020;4(11):197–216.
Contens: Summary | Introduction | Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | Discussion | Consclusion | Term of consent | Author contributions | Conflict of interests | Fundings | References (46)
Odontogenic cutaneous sinus tract (OCST) (synonyms: odontogenic cutaneous fistula, odontogenic subcutaneous granuloma, etc.) is an abnormal tube-shape formation which serves as a pathway for pus drainage from the locus of tooth–associated infection to the cutaneous lesion.
OCST is a collective term and commonly is manifested in six cutaneous forms: as dimpling with fistula, cutaneous infiltration, nodule, suppurated nodule, abscess, or even cyst-like cutaneous formation. The purpose of this paper is to present the diverse clinical and radiological appearance (cone-beam computed tomography [CBCT] and ultrasound [US]) of single and multiple OCSTs based on the literature and our four cases.
As long as limited publications present the ultrasound appearance of the OCSTs, we will focus on meticulous description of sonograms as well, giving a possibility for oral and maxillofacial surgeons to understand all advantages of that type of non-ionizing radiation diagnostics, avoiding misdiagnosis and mistreatment of OCSTs.
Case 1: A 24-year-old male with OCST to the left mandibular region from the lower left first molar. Cutaneous lesion of OCST manifested as a transition stage from cutaneous infiltration to abscess.
Case 2: A 41-year-old male with odontogenic cutaneous fistula of the right mandibular body region from the lower right second molar. It`s manifested as deep dimpling with active fistula.
Case 3: A 45-year-old male with unilateral multiple OCSTs: 1) odontogenic cutaneous fistula of the left cheek from the left second maxillary molar and 2) a scar from a surgically treated OCST located in the projection of the left mandible from the tooth #3.6.
Case 4: An 18-year-old male with OCST to left nasolabial fold and cheek from the upper left first molar. The pathology manifested as a subcutaneous abscess first and a nodule after the abscess lancing.
These cases highlight the diverse cutaneous manifestations of the OCSTs. The US appearances of different parts of the OCST are presented, the popular terminology for the same cutaneous lesions are discussed, the new terms are proposed, and the treatment strategies based on histologic results are debated.
Odontogenic cutaneous sinus tract1 (synonyms: odontogenic cutaneous fistula,2,3 extraoral sinus tract of endodontic origin4 , odontogenic subcutaneous granuloma5 , etc.) is an abnormal tube-shape formation which serves as a pathway for pus drainage from the locus of tooth-associated infection to the cutaneous lesion.
Odontogenic cutaneous sinus tract (OCST) is a collective term and commonly is manifested in six cutaneous forms: as dimpling with fistula, cutaneous infiltration, nodule, suppurated nodule, abscess, or even cyst-like cutaneous formation.3
Other common name for the cutaneous infiltration/abscess appearance is odontogenic subcutaneous granuloma.5
Those two clinically different manifestations are two clinical stages and in some countries are jointly named as odontogenic subcutaneous granuloma which has two clinical forms.
Moreover, in some cases, when a subcutaneous granuloma do not has the sinus tract and the focus of odontogenic infection, it is considered non-odontogenic.6 In particular, Tymofieiev observed the onset of non-odontogenic subcutaneous granuloma due to the penetration of such organic–composed foreign bodies6 as a pine needle and nail.5
Some cutaneous manifestations of the OCST the authors describe as ulcerated nodules7 and nodulocystic cutaneous lesions7,8.
One of the previously applied names for the OCST with fistula and notable extraoral pyorrhea was a “Partsch chronic granulating periodontitis”9 .
The purpose of this paper is to present the diverse clinical and radiological appearance (cone-beam computed tomography [CBCT] and ultrasound [US]) of a single and multiple OCSTs based on the literature and our four cases.
Limited publications7,10,1,4 exist presenting ultrasonographic appearance of the OCSTs, so we will focus on meticulous description of sonograms as well, giving a possibility for oral and maxillofacial surgeons to understand all advantages of that type of non-ionizing radiation diagnostics, avoiding misdiagnosis and mistreatment of OCSTs.
REPORT OF CASES
In February 2012, a 24-year-old male was referred to the Center of Maxillofacial Surgery with complaints for several-week redness in the left mandibular region (Fig 1).
Extraoral examination showed a round shape skin erythema with cutaneous infiltration. Intraoral examination revealed a destroyed crown of the tooth #3.6 by carious process.
Panoramic radiography showed periapical radiolucency at the roots of mandibular first left molar measured 8.6 × 9 mm with no filling material inside the canals.
Palpation revealed a firm strand from alveolar bone to the left mandibular region passing into the submucosal layer. Clinically, the cutaneous lesion manifested as a transition stage from infiltration to abscess stage of odontogenic subcutaneous granuloma.
Cutaneous manifestations completely self-disappeared (after tooth #3.6 removal and prescription of antibiotics) at 25-day follow-up. Such fact gave us a reason to hypothesize that the case was a reversible cutaneous manifestation of OCST with no need of surgery.
FIGURE 1A Case 1: A 24-year-old male with odontogenic cutaneous sinus tract (A, B) to the left mandibular region from the lower left first molar. OCST manifested as a transition stage from cutaneous infiltration to abscess of odontogenic subcutaneous granuloma (arrow). Cutaneous manifestations completely self-disappeared (after tooth #3.6 removal and prescription of antibiotic) at 25-day follow-up. Printed with permission and copyrights retained by R.A.P.
FIGURE 1B Case 1: A 24-year-old male with odontogenic cutaneous sinus tract (A, B) to the left mandibular region from the lower left first molar. OCST manifested as a transition stage from cutaneous infiltration to abscess of odontogenic subcutaneous granuloma (arrow). Cutaneous manifestations completely self-disappeared (after tooth #3.6 removal and prescription of antibiotic) at 25-day follow-up. Printed with permission and copyrights retained by R.A.P.
In January 2015, a 41-year-old male was referred to the Сenter of Maxillofacial Surgery and Dentistry with cosmetic complaints – a deep skin dimpling with active fistula in the right mandibular area (Fig 2A and B).
Periodically, during the last years, the patient noted the appearance of purulent discharge in the center of dimpling.
FIGURE 2. Case 2: A 41-year-old male with odontogenic cutaneous fistula of the right mandibular body region from the lower right second molar (ie, tooth #4.7). At the anterior view (A) the deep skin dimpling is indicated by arrow. Printed with permission and copyrights retained by I.I.F. (Fig 2 continued on next page.)
Intraorally, a firm strand was palpated from the alveolar bone of the lower right second molar to the cutaneous fistula.
Simultaneously, a horizontal oblique anteroposterior direction of the strand was noted. No visual mucosal changes were vizualized (Fig 2C).
Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) (Planmeca ProMax 3D, Helsinki, Finland) showed the absence of contrast filling material in all three canals of the tooth #4.7 and well-defined periradicular radiolucency around roots` ends and in a furcation area with an oval shape buccal cortical plate defect (Fig 2D–G).
Using of a “draw a panoramic curve” tool in the Planmeca Romexis Viewer 3.8.3R 15.12.14 allowed obtaining a panoramic view (Fig 2G).
FIGURE 2 (continued). Axial scans (E, F) and panoramic view (G) (obtained using a tool “draw a panoramic curve”) showed well-defined periradicular radiolucency with buccal defect (arrowheads) around the tooth #4.7 and no contrast filling material in its all three canals (mesiobuccal, mesiolingual, and distal). Printed with permission and copyrights retained by I.I.F. (Fig 2 continued on next page.)
FIGURE 2 (continued). Axial scans (E, F) and panoramic view (G) (obtained using a tool “draw a panoramic curve”) showed well-defined periradicular radiolucency with buccal defect (arrowheads) around the tooth #4.7 and no contrast filling material in its all three canals (mesiobuccal, mesiolingual, and distal). Printed with permission and copyrights retained by I.I.F. (Fig 2 continued on next page.)
FIGURE 2 (continued). Axial scans (E, F) and panoramic view (G) (obtained using a tool “draw a panoramic curve”) showed well-defined periradicular radiolucency with buccal defect (arrowheads) around the tooth #4.7 and no contrast filling material in its all three canals (mesiobuccal, mesiolingual, and distal). Printed with permission and copyrights retained by I.I.F. (Fig 2 continued on next page.)
FIGURE 2 (continued). Case 2: A 41-year-old male with odontogenic cutaneous fistula of the right mandibular body region from the lower right second molar (ie, tooth #4.7). Image H demonstrates operative field after elevation of the mucoperiosteal flap and dissection of the sinus tract (arrowhead) originated from the tooth #4.7 alveola through the buccal plate perforation.
Removal of the sinus tract and extraction of a tooth #4.7 have been performed under general anesthesia with local vestibular infiltration by 1.4 ml Ultracain D-S Forte (4 percent articaine hydrochloride, Aventis Pharma Deutschland GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, Germany).
First, the elevation of the mucoperiosteal flap with dissection of the sinus tract originated from the tooth #4.7`s alveola was done (Fig 2H).
Then, the tract and a cutaneous fistula have been excised (Fig 2I and J) with a local plastic closure of the skin defect. Histopathological examination of the specimen (ie, sinus tract) established the presence of the soft tissues with a cavity lined with granulations and inflammation around.
In March 2016, a 45-year-old male was treated in Orthopedic Surgery Department due to the fracture of lower extremity.
Simultaneously, an odontogenic cutaneous fistula of the left cheek (Fig 3) from the maxillary left second molar was diagnosed by an oral surgeon of the same hospital.
Despite the recommendations the patient declined the further maxillofacial diagnostics and treatment.
Figure 3 also demonstrates a scar in the left mandibular region where a similar fistula had been excised several years ago (according to patient`s words). During surgery, a causative tooth #3.6 was extracted.
FIGURE 3. Case 3: A 45-year-old male with odontogenic cutaneous fistula (arrow) of the left cheek from the maxillary left second molar. Arrowhead labels a postoperative scar in the left mandibular region where a similar fistula had been excised several years ago in other hospital. Printed with permission and copyrights retained by I.I.F.
So, that case with unilateral multiple OCSTs supports the data of Tymofieiev describing multiple odontogenic cutaneous sinus tracts with cutaneous manifestations in a form of infiltration or abscess.5,6
In July 2016, an 18-year-old male was referred to the Center of Maxillofacial Surgery and Dentistry complaining for a painful increasing skin swelling in the left cheek region with erythema.
According to patient`s words, edema started to grow after the football game left cheek trauma.
During the extraoral examination, an oval shape painful skin erythema with well-defined margins (Fig 4A and B) was noted in the region of left nasolabial fold and upper aspect of buccal region.
Intraoral examination with palpation revealed a firm strand (synonym: cord-like8 formation) in submucosal layer originated from the buccal alveolar bone near tooth #2.6 passing to the region of left nasolabial fold. Tooth #2.6 was non-movable and percussion test was negative.
Figures 4C and D have been taken 19 days after the abscess was surgically drained: an oval–shaped erythematous nodule in a place of the previously treated subcutaneous abscess was visualized.
CBCT (Planmeca ProMax 3D, Helsinki, Finland), performed during the first visit (Figs 4E–M), showed two incompletely treated canals of the tooth #2.6: mesiobuccal – with round shape periapical radiolucency measured 0.91 × 0.7 × 1.36 cm involving buccal plate and palatal – with periapical radiolucency measured 0.58 × 0.46 × 0.64 cm.
According to the CT, palatal canal was sealed 3/4 of the length and mesiobuccal – 1/4 of the length.
A minimal (1.72 mm) maxillary sinus mucosa thickening11 (Fig 4M) was observed at the inferior and lateral walls of the left antrum (ie, left maxillary sinus) close to the periapical radiolucency areas.
According to Bornstein et al,12 mucosal thickening less than 2 mm is considered as a non-pathologic sinus membrane.
FIGURE 4 (continued). Case 4: An 18-year-old male with odontogenic cutaneous sinus tract to left nasolabial fold and cheek from the upper left first molar (ie, tooth #2.6). Chronic infection–induced bone defect on 3-dimensional (E, G) and panoramic (obtained using slice autofocus option) (F) CBCT images is indicated by arrowheads. Coronal scan (H) precisely visualizes the alveolar part of the tract (arrowheads). Sequence of axial scans (I–M) showed untreated mesiobuccal canal (arrows) which became a cause of the chronic periapical abscess (white arrowhead). The direction and the lateral wall of the sinus tract are labeled by black arrowheads. Incompletely treated palatal canal is labeled by curved arrow. Larger periapical radiolucency (in the area of buccal roots) (arrowhead) measured 9.17 × 7.00 × 13.69 mm. An insignificant (1.72 mm) maxillary sinus mucosa thickening is indicated by dot. Printed with permission and copyrights retained by I.I.F. (Fig 4 continued on next page.)
Figure 4N demonstrates the longitudinal position (related to sinus tract passage) of the linear probe (frequency range: 12-3 MHz) during ultrasonography (model HD11 XE, Philips) on day 19 after the subcutaneous abscess lancing with antibiotic prescription.
Gray scale ultrasound (Fig 4O) showed hypoechoic triangular well-defined lesion (measured 1.11 cm in longitudinal direction) in subcutaneous layer with a tube-form hypoechoic curved continuation (0.62 cm in diameter and 2.19 cm in length) to the echoic surface of the left maxilla.
Artifact of acoustic shadowing was clearly visualized behind the echoic surface.
The lack of intralesional vascularity on color (Fig 4P) and power (Fig 4Q) Doppler sonograms indicated the team that there was no acute inflammation in the area of lesion.
US of the intraosseous part (ie, tooth #2.6 periradicular lesion`s part) of the tract (Fig 4R) showed a round–shaped hypoechoic lesion (with heterogenic content) measured 0.7 × 1.02 cm and surrounded by echoic borders of intraosseous maxillary cavity (formed by chronic periapical abscess).
FIGURE 4 (continued). Case 4: An 18-year-old male with odontogenic cutaneous sinus tract to left nasolabial fold and cheek from the upper left first molar (ie, tooth #2.6). Image N demonstrates the longitudinal position (related to sinus tract passage) of the linear transducer during ultrasonography (images O–Q) on day 19 after the subcutaneous abscess lancing with antibiotic prescription. Gray scale ultrasound (O) showed hypoechoic triangular well-defined lesion (arrow) (measured 1.11 cm in longitudinal direction) in subcutaneous layer with a tube-form hypoechoic curved continuation (0.62 cm in diameter and 2.19 cm in length) to the echoic surface (waved arrow) of the left maxilla. Artifact of acoustic shadowing is indicated by asterisk. Color (P) and power (Q) Doppler sonograms revealed no intralesional vascularity. This means that there is no acute inflammation in the area of lesion. Gray scale US of the intraosseous part of the tract (R) showed a round shape hypoechoic lesion (indicated by ‘+’ and ‘×’ calipers) (with heterogenic content) measured 0.7 × 1.02 cm and surrounded by echoic borders (waved arrows) of intraosseous maxillary cavity (formed by chronic periapical abscess). At the intraoperative image (S) the dissected sinus tract (arrowhead) is elevated by an instrument before its excision. Printed with permission and copyrights retained by O.S.C. (images O–R) and I.I.F (images S).
The surgery was done under general anesthesia with local infiltration by 1.4 ml Ultracain D-S Forte (4 percent articaine hydrochloride, Aventis Pharma Deutschland GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, Germany).
First, the mucoperiosteal flap was reflected and a cordlike sinus tract was dissected (Fig 4S) after its empty structure and direction has been confirmed through the transnodal (ie, transcutaneous) introduction of a metal probe.
Then, simultaneously with cutaneous nodule, the tract was excised and the tooth #2.6 was extracted. Histologic examination of the specimen revealed granulomatous tissue with inflammation.
Video 1 showes periradicular lesion of the tooth #2.6 which involved both apices and furcation area.
Video is available in the page of the full-text article on dtjournal.org and in the YouTube channel, available at https://youtu.be/QkQDvrRMZYw.
Total video`s duration: 39 seconds.
VIDEO 1. Case 4: An 18-year-old male with odontogenic cutaneous sinus tract to left nasolabial fold and cheek from the improperly treated upper left first molar (ie, tooth #2.6).
Video represents a sequence of coronal CBCT scans. Notes two periradicular lesions: 1) a larger one (a sinus tract causative lesion) (arrowhead) around the tooth #2.6 which involves mesio- and distobuccal root apices and furcation area and 2) a smaller lesion around the apex of the palatal root.
Video is available in the page of the full-text article on dtjournal.org and in the YouTube channel, available at https://youtu.be/QkQDvrRMZYw. Or just point the smartphone/tablet camera at the QR code and click on the pop-up menu “Open … in ... .” Total video`s duration: 39 seconds. Printed with permission and copyrights retained by I.I.F.
Analysis of the four cases with OCSTs revealed (Table 1):
TABLE 1. Patient Data, Cutaneous Manifestations of the OCSTs, Associated Teeth, and Management
Case | Age (yr)/ Gender | Cutaneous Manifestations | Area of Manifestations | Tooth # | Management |
1 | 24/M | Cutaneous infiltration with formation of the abscess | Left mandibular body | 3.6 | Tooth extraction + antibiotics |
2 | 41/M | Fistula with deep dimpling | Right mandibular body | 4.7 | Tooth extraction, tract + cutaneous lesion excision, and local skin plasty |
3 | 45/M |
Fistula with dimpling
Scar after treated fistula with dimpling |
Left cheek
Left mandibular body |
2.7
3.6 |
The patient refused any treatment
In anamnesis: tooth extraction, tract + cutaneous lesion excision, and local skin plasty was performed |
4 | 18/M |
Abscess at first consultation
Nodule at day 19 after abscess lancing |
Left nasolabial fold | 2.6 | First visit – abscess lancing, second visit – tooth extraction and excision of the skin lesion with a sinus tract |
Odontogenic cutaneous sinus tract can be termed as “chronic periapical abscess with an extraoral sinus opening13”.
Metzger et al applied a similar term, “a chronic apical abscess,” describing the origin of OCST.14
Giménez-García et al15 highlighted that sinus tracts can also originate from loci of the osteomyelitis, osteonecrosis, suppurative infections, infected cysts, and tubercular infection. Even the case of an extraoral draining actinomycotic sinus tract with bifurcation was described by Göçmen et al.16
Kishore Kumar et al`s clinical study of 200 patients with cutaneous sinuses of the cervicofacial region clearly showed that 80 percent of them are of odontogenic origin.17
Usually OCST appears as a single unilateral pathologic process, but in rare cases can be noted a several OCSTs (ie, multiple OCSTs)5,6 what is proved by the case 3 (with unilateral multiple OCSTs) of our report. The multiple OCSTs in the study of Sakamoto and Stratigos were named as bilateral cutaneous sinus tracts of dental etiology due to the localization of the last.18
Tremendously huge variety of cutaneous manifestations of the OCSTs leads to its different clinical descriptions in the publications, terms, and the number of initial misdiagnosis19.
Lee et al3 in 2016, based on the analysis of thirty-four OCSTs, described four most common morphological types of cutaneous manifestations:
Trying to highlight a wide variety of descriptions of cutaneous part of the OCSTs, here are just a few of them:
1) erythematous, exophytic nodule with a crusted surface and a central stoma13, 2) puckered appearance on the skin20, 3) an erythematous, crusted nodule measuring about 50 mm with pus discharge21, 4) affected skin can be hyperemic or of a normal color, thinned, cyanotic, glossy, forms folds and unevenness5,6, 5) reddish abscess 2.5 cm in diameter22, 6) orocutaneous fistula19, 7) granuloma (ie, such type of cutaneous manifestation of OCST [not a pyogenic granuloma]) sizes are variable (from 1 to 3-4 cm)5 , 8) classically, the lesion presented as an erythematous nodule of diameter up to 2 cm with or without drainage23, 9) nodulocystic cutaneous lesion7 , 10) cutaneous fistula with hyperpigmented retracted skin24, etc.
Though the term “parulis” is sometimes applied25 to the skin part of the OCST, predominantly, the “parulis” (ie, gingival abscess) name, is used for the submucosal abscess in the gingival tissues26 linked by fistula with a locus of odontogenic infection and can be diagnosed by gutta-percha point (ie, guttapercha cone7 ).
Neville et al27 described parulis as an exophitic, erythematous or yellowish mass of granulation tissue on the gingival/alveolar mucosa. In our opinion, all cutaneous manifestations of the OCSTs can be divided into the two types (Fig 5):
FIGURE 5. Comparison of odontogenic cutaneous sinus tracts with “above” (A–C) and “below the skin level” (D, E) cutaneous manifestations in four patients. Abscess (A), nodule (B), cutaneous infiltration (C), dimpling with non-active fistula (D), and the deep dimpling with active fistula (E) are labeled by arrows. (Fig 5 continued on next page.)
FIGURE 5 (continued). Comparison of odontogenic cutaneous sinus tracts with “above” (A–C) and “below the skin level” (D, E) cutaneous manifestations in four patients. Abscess (A), nodule (B), cutaneous infiltration (C), dimpling with non-active fistula (D), and the deep dimpling with active fistula (E) are labeled by arrows.
This partitioning of OCST cutaneous part appearances is similar to the partitioning into 1) odontogenic cutaneous fistulas and 2) odontogenic subcutaneous granulomas.5,6
It should be remembered that 50 percent of patients affected by OCSTs are subjected to incorrect management before the correct diagnosis is established.28 But it`s easy to avoid the misdiagnosis by using the combination of such an advanced technologies like ultrasonography (ie, ultrasound [US]) and CBCT. There is an urgent need to highlight for oral and maxillofacial surgeons the advantages of the US for their practice in general and for the diagnostics of the OCSTs in particular.
The differential diagnosis of OCST includes the sinus tracts of all other origins (actinomycosis, osteomyelitis, etc)16,17, pyogenic granuloma19, non-odontogenic subcutaneous granuloma5,6, infected sebaceous gland cyst (also known as atheroma)5 , suppurative lymphadenitis5,21, furuncle29, malignancies30,31, etc.
Moreover, Kim et al reported a unique case of cutaneous basal cell carcinoma arising in the area of odontogenic cutaneous fistula in a 64-year-old male patient.32
Pseudofluctuation (feeling upon palpation for the false wavelike motion of the collected fluid [eg, pus]) is one of the core sings for the OCST manifested as a subcutaneous granuloma.6 In fact, the symptom of pseudofluctuation is explained by the abundance of granulation tissue in the pathological focus.5
Honestly saying, Lee, Oh, and Yoon and other authors27,33 are more than right when notice that a term “pyogenic granuloma” is a misnomer as it does not contain purulent content and is not, strictly speaking, a granuloma upon the histopathological examination.19
The best way to avoid OCST misdiagnosis and mismanagement is to choose the best diagnostic technology or its combination.
Such a radiation free imaging modality as ultrasound proved its efficacy even upon assessment of jaw bone healing after rootend surgeries.34
The soft tissues US investigation has even much wider diagnostic horizons.
And we found four English language articles which described fifteen OCST cases examined by US (Table 2): 3 (Shobatake et al, 2014)7 , 1 (Garido Colmenero et al, 2015)10, 1 (Lee and Yun, 2016)1 , and 10 cases (Cotti et al, 2019)4 .
TABLE 2. English Language Publications Which Describe Ultrasonography of the OCSTs.
# | Authors and Article`s Title | Year | Number of Examined OCSTs | Journal |
1 | Shobatake et al. Usefulness of ultrasonography for rapidly diagnosing cutaneous sinus tracts of dental origin.7 | 2014 | 3 | European Journal of Dermatology |
2 | Garrido Colmenero et al. Diagnostic value of color Doppler ultrasound for cutaneous odontogenic sinus tract.10 | 2015 | 1 | Actas DermoSifiliográficas |
3 | Lee and Yun. Odontogenic cutaneous sinus tract presenting as a growing cheek mass in the emergency department.1 | 2017 | 1 | American Journal of Emergency Medicine |
4 | Cotti et al. Ultrasound examination to visualize and trace sinus tracts of endodontic origin.4 | 2019 | 10 | Journal of Endodontics |
Two papers (50 percent) were published in dermatological journals, one (25 percent) in the emergency medicine journal, and one (25 percent) in the dental journal devoted to endodontics.
Analyzing the international experience and our case we summarized the US features of the OCSTs in the Table 3.
TABLE 3. Ultrasound Appearance (Description) of Different Parts of the OCSTs Based on the Data of Literature and Our Report.
Article | Intra-/ Periosseous Part | Sinus Tract | Cutaneous/ Subcutaneous Part |
Shobatake et al7 | No data |
Gray scale US: Hypoechoic band that originated from the cutaneous lesion and extended through the subcutaneous tissue to the alveolar bone. Color Doppler US showed some color signals around the lesion |
No data |
Garrido Colmenero et al10 | No data | Gray scale US: A slightly tortuous, relatively well-defined, hypoechoic linear structure extending to the surface of the cortical plate of the jaw | No data |
Lee and Yun1 | No data | Gray scale US: A heterogeneous hypoechoic mass | Gray scale US: Hyperechoic. Color Doppler US reveals intralesional vascularity |
Cotti et al4 | Gray scale US: Apical periodontitis visualized as anechoic to hypoechoic areas | Gray scale US: The sinus tracts appeared as dishomogeneous, hypoechoic pathways lined by echogenic and reinforced wallsGray scale US: The sinus tracts appeared as dishomogeneous, hypoechoic pathways lined by echogenic and reinforced walls | Gray scale US: Hypoechoic band (ie, sinus tract) crossed the muscular layer of the muscle to reach the surface of the skin |
Our study: Cherniak et al | Gray scale US: Roundshape hypoechoic lesion (with heterogenic content) surrounded by echoic borders of pathologic intraosseous jaw cavity | Gray scale US: Tube-form (curved strand) hypoechoic continuation (0.62 cm in diameter and 2.19 cm in length) of the cutaneous lesion to the echoic jaw surface | Gray scale US: A hypoechoic triangular well-defined lesion (measured 1.11 cm in longitudinal direction) in subcutaneous layer |
So, the US proved its usefulness in understanding weather the cutaneous lesion has the sinus tract and in helping to trace its direction (ie, to perform ultrasound tracing [synonym: ecographic tracing4 ]) and find the locus of its origin.
Highest precision of endodontic diagnosis/ management in cases of the OCSTs is proved by the studies highlighted the CBCT.35,36
Sodnom-Ish et al presented the arguments for using a CT with soft tissue window setting, as the path of the sinus tract was easily identified in both of their cases.28
Figure 4M also demonstrates the possibilities of CBCT in the identification of the sinus tract.
Swales et al`s review analysis of the implemented treatment tactics showed its great variety.29 But the most correct choice of treatment in every particular situation will be possible if we take into consideration two core things: 1) microscopical composition of the sinus tracts and 2) all pro and contra of management tactics.
Harrison and Larson proved that 9 of the 10 intraoral (ie, oral) sinus tracts (ie, those which extend from periapical lesions to the alveolar mucosa) were lined with granulation tissue that contained chronic inflammatory cells.37
Only one of the 10 was lined with stratified squamous epithelium.37
The authors concluded that there is no dependence of presence of the epithelial lining from the existence of the sinus tract.37,38
Baumgartner et al presented a study based on 30 examined oral sinus tracts and in 67 percent of cases the sinus tracts were lined by granulomatous tissue and only in 33 percent cases by epithelial lining to the level of periapex.38
In the investigated cases the epithelial lining originated not from the periapical lesion`s epithelium but from the mucosal surface.37
Bai et al presented a data of 53-year-old man with OCST of the submental area from lower left second molar; and pathological analysis clearly confirmed that the tract was lined with granulation tissue. 39
In a 64-year-old male patient with cutaneous basal cell carcinoma arising in odontogenic cutaneous fistula the sinus tract was also lined by inflamed granulation tissue.32
Chang highlighted two case reports (23-year-old and 55-year-old males) with extraoral odontogenic sinus tracts which included its excision and in both patients the histologic report revealed chronic inflammation with fibrosis.40
Other sources, which describe an odontogenic subcutaneous granuloma (as an OCST manifestations), reported the presence of granulation tissue in subcutaneous layer (in a place of cutaneous lesion), where it develops in the form of separate clusters – granulomas.5,6
The sinus tract lining with granulations was also proved by our two cases (case 2 and 4). This pathohistological feature of sinus tracts in the published reports and in our cases supports the opinions presented in the works of Barrowman et al41 and Pasternak-Júnior et al42 that OCSTs can and should be treated endodontically.
Berman and Rotstein insisted that presence/absence of an epithelial lining does not seem to prevent closure of the tract as long as the source of the problem is properly diagnosed and adequately treated and the tooth-associated infection has eliminated.25
Thus, although conservative treatment22,29,36 nowadays is highly advocated, we strongly recommend (taking into account the experience from Korea)32 to choose between two different management combinations for the group of elderly patients: 1) endodontic plus surgical treatment (apicoectomy + excision of the tract and cutaneous lesion) or 2) necrotic tooth extraction + excision of the tract and cutaneous lesion.
But we should remember the experience of Pérez-Alfonzo et al43 who emphasized that OCST can be refractory to standard treatments in cases of possible infection due to nontuberculous mycobacteria.
Varghese et al notice: in some cases (when the cutaneous changes are reversible) endodontic treatment of the necrotic tooth alone can eliminate the need for surgery, and in other cases (when the cutaneous changes are irreversible) – at least such treatment can improve the condition of the tissues in area of cutaneous lesion.13
Resolution of dimpling and hyperpigmentation is usually very slow and it can remain for a long time. So, the surgical revision may be needed for esthetic reasons.3
Rahpeyma and Khajehahmadi recommended performing a needle subcision for the conservative treatment for facial dimpling after elimination of the source of odontogenic infection.44 It`s important to understand that possibility of the extraoral sinus tract to develop appears not only in the case of chronic periapical abscess but also in cases after the tooth extraction.45
In about 19 percent of the 117 patients (with nonhealing sinuses and fistulous tracts) from the study of Chowdri et al, the sinus tracts followed teeth extractions.45
Such postextraction sinus tract may be caused by incorrect sterilization, antibiotic use, surgical technique, or attempted tooth extraction in the presence of infection.45
Summarizing, it`s important to remember the opinion of Jibbe and Tolkachjov. 46 No matter what is a level of radiological knowledge of the surgeon the need to re-read or to re-watch the sonograms or CT scans are very important when clinical suspicion does not correlate with the radiological report.46 Also, taking into consideration the histological structure of the extraoral sinus tract itself and its skin manifestations, we can consider appropriate to continue to use the term odontogenic subcutaneous granuloma in a certain cases, but with mandatory indication of its clinical stage. Such cases are above the skin level manifestations of the OCST like cutaneous infiltration, nodule, and abscess.
In sum, the odontogenic cutaneous sinus tract is a collective term for the locus of toothassociated infection and pathologic exudatedraining tube-shape formation to one of at least seven possible cutaneous manifestations, such as dimpling with fistula, cutaneous infiltration, abscess, nodule, suppurated nodule, odontogenic cutaneous granuloma with fistula, or even cyst-like lesion.
Moreover, those manifestations can transform one into another depending on different reasons, what is proved by a literature and our cases.
Combination of diagnostics methods like ultrasound and computed tomography can guarantee the highest level of accuracy in establishing the diagnosis and lowest level of mistreatment especially for the less experienced doctors.
Written patient consent was obtained from all patients to publish the clinical photographs.
Conceptualization: Fesenko II. Data acquisition: Cherniak OS, Snisarevskyi PP, Zaritska VI, Pavlenko RA. Data analysis or interpretation: Koba NM, Fesenko II. Drafting of the manuscript: Blinova VP, Holodenko VM. Critical revision of the manuscript: Zaritska VI, Fesenko II, Cherniak OS. Approval of the final version of the manuscript: all authors.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
No funding was received for this study.